皇上,还记得我吗?我就是1999年那个Linux伊甸园啊-----24小时滚动更新开源资讯,全年无休!

TIOBE 2020年10月指数

Python conquered the third position in the TIOBE index last year, but its popularity is still rising. This month it has reached a new all time high at 11.28%. Since Java is approaching its all time low since 2001, Python and Java are getting pretty close. The gap is now less than 1.3%. Since the start of the TIOBE index, C and Java have always held the 2 top positions. So it would be a unique event, if Python would reach position #2. Let’s see what will happen the next few months. – Paul Jansen, CEO TIOBE Software

The TIOBE Programming Community index is an indicator of the popularity of programming languages. The index is updated once a month. The ratings are based on the number of skilled engineers world-wide, courses and third party vendors. Popular search engines such as Google, Bing, Yahoo!, Wikipedia, Amazon, YouTube and Baidu are used to calculate the ratings. It is important to note that the TIOBE index is not about the best programming language or the language in which most lines of code have been written.

The index can be used to check whether your programming skills are still up to date or to make a strategic decision about what programming language should be adopted when starting to build a new software system. The definition of the TIOBE index can be found here.

Oct 2020 Oct 2019 Change Programming Language Ratings Change
1 2 TIOBE 2020年10月指数 C 16.95% +0.77%
2 1 TIOBE 2020年10月指数 Java 12.56% -4.32%
3 3 Python 11.28% +2.19%
4 4 C++ 6.94% +0.71%
5 5 C# 4.16% +0.30%
6 6 Visual Basic 3.97% +0.23%
7 7 JavaScript 2.14% +0.06%
8 9 TIOBE 2020年10月指数 PHP 2.09% +0.18%
9 15 TIOBE 2020年10月指数 R 1.99% +0.73%
10 8 TIOBE 2020年10月指数 SQL 1.57% -0.37%
11 19 TIOBE 2020年10月指数 Perl 1.43% +0.40%
12 11 TIOBE 2020年10月指数 Groovy 1.23% -0.16%
13 13 Ruby 1.16% -0.16%
14 17 TIOBE 2020年10月指数 Go 1.16% +0.06%
15 20 TIOBE 2020年10月指数 MATLAB 1.12% +0.19%
16 12 TIOBE 2020年10月指数 Swift 1.09% -0.28%
17 14 TIOBE 2020年10月指数 Assembly language 1.08% -0.23%
18 10 TIOBE 2020年10月指数 Objective-C 0.86% -0.64%
19 16 TIOBE 2020年10月指数 Classic Visual Basic 0.77% -0.46%
20 22 TIOBE 2020年10月指数 PL/SQL 0.77% -0.06%

 

Created with Highcharts 8.2.0Ratings (%)CJavaPythonC++C#Visual BasicJavaScriptPHPRSQL2002200420062008201020122014201620182020051015202530

Other programming languages

The complete top 50 of programming languages is listed below. This overview is published unofficially, because it could be the case that we missed a language. If you have the impression there is a programming language lacking, please notify us at tpci@tiobe.com. Please also check the overview of all programming languages that we monitor.

Position Programming Language Ratings
21 SAS 0.73%
22 Delphi/Object Pascal 0.71%
23 Scratch 0.71%
24 Transact-SQL 0.71%
25 Rust 0.68%
26 Dart 0.55%
27 Logo 0.54%
28 Scala 0.50%
29 ABAP 0.45%
30 Scheme 0.42%
31 Prolog 0.42%
32 Julia 0.40%
33 Kotlin 0.39%
34 D 0.39%
35 Lisp 0.39%
36 COBOL 0.38%
37 Fortran 0.38%
38 Lua 0.35%
39 Ada 0.35%
40 PowerShell 0.35%
41 Bash 0.33%
42 OpenEdge ABL 0.30%
43 Alice 0.25%
44 VHDL 0.23%
45 Haskell 0.22%
46 TypeScript 0.22%
47 Apex 0.22%
48 ML 0.21%
49 (Visual) FoxPro 0.21%
50 Awk 0.21%

The Next 50 Programming Languages

The following list of languages denotes #51 to #100. Since the differences are relatively small, the programming languages are only listed (in alphabetical order).

  • ABC, ActionScript, APL, AutoLISP, bc, Bourne shell, C shell, cg, CL (OS/400), Clojure, CoffeeScript, Common Lisp, Crystal, Dylan, Elixir, Emacs Lisp, Erlang, F#, Falcon, Forth, Hack, Icon, IDL, Inform, Io, J, Korn shell, LabVIEW, Ladder Logic, Lingo, LiveCode, Maple, MEL, Mercury, MQL4, NATURAL, Nim, OpenCL, PL/I, Q, Ring, RPG, Simulink, Smalltalk, Solidity, SPARK, Stata, Tcl, VBScript, Verilog

This Month’s Changes in the Index

This month the following changes have been made to the definition of the index:

  • Adrian Arroyo Calle suggested to add the Zig language to the TIOBE index. Zig meets all criteria and enters the TIOBE index at position #114. Thanks for this suggestion, Adrian!
  • There are lots of mails that still need to be processed. As soon as there is more time available your mail will be answered. Please be patient.

Very Long Term History

To see the bigger picture, please find below the positions of the top 10 programming languages of many years back. Please note that these are average positions for a period of 12 months.

Programming Language 2020 2015 2010 2005 2000 1995 1990 1985
C 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 1
Java 2 1 1 2 3 29
Python 3 6 6 6 21 15
C++ 4 3 3 3 2 1 2 9
C# 5 4 5 7 9
JavaScript 6 8 8 10 7
PHP 7 7 4 5 19
SQL 8
Swift 9 16
R 10 13 49
Lisp 29 25 15 13 8 5 6 2
Fortran 31 24 24 15 15 17 3 5
Ada 33 27 22 17 17 4 7 3
Pascal 242 15 14 16 16 3 10 6

Programming Language Hall of Fame

The hall of fame listing all “Programming Language of the Year” award winners is shown below. The award is given to the programming language that has the highest rise in ratings in a year.

Year Winner
2019 TIOBE 2020年10月指数 C
2018 TIOBE 2020年10月指数 Python
2017 TIOBE 2020年10月指数 C
2016 TIOBE 2020年10月指数 Go
2015 TIOBE 2020年10月指数 Java
2014 TIOBE 2020年10月指数 JavaScript
2013 TIOBE 2020年10月指数 Transact-SQL
2012 TIOBE 2020年10月指数 Objective-C
2011 TIOBE 2020年10月指数 Objective-C
2010 TIOBE 2020年10月指数 Python
2009 TIOBE 2020年10月指数 Go
2008 TIOBE 2020年10月指数 C
2007 TIOBE 2020年10月指数 Python
2006 TIOBE 2020年10月指数 Ruby
2005 TIOBE 2020年10月指数 Java
2004 TIOBE 2020年10月指数 PHP
2003 TIOBE 2020年10月指数 C++

Bugs & Change Requests

This is the top 5 of most requested changes and bugs. If you have any suggestions how to improve the index don’t hesitate to send an e-mail to tpci@tiobe.com.

  1. Apart from “<language> programming”, also other queries such as “programming with <language>”, “<language> development” and “<language> coding” should be tried out.
  2. Add queries for other natural languages (apart from English). The idea is to start with the Chinese search engine Baidu. This has been implemented partially and will be completed the next few months.
  3. Add a list of all search term requests that have been rejected. This is to minimize the number of recurring mails about Rails, JQuery, JSP, etc.
  4. Start a TIOBE index for databases, software configuration management systems and application frameworks.
  5. Some search engines allow to query pages that have been added last year. The TIOBE index should only track those recently added pages.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

  • Q: Am I allowed to show the TIOBE index in my weblog/presentation/publication?A: Yes, the only condition is to refer to its original source “www.tiobe.com”.
  • Q: How may I nominate a new language to be added to the TIOBE index?A: If a language meets the criteria of being listed (i.e. it is Turing complete and has an own Wikipedia entry that indicates that it concerns a programming language) and it is sufficiently popular (more than 5,000 hits for +”<language> programming” for Google), then please write an e-mail to tpci@tiobe.com.
  • Q: I would like to have the complete data set of the TIOBE index. Is this possible?A: We spent a lot of effort to obtain all the data and keep the TIOBE index up to date. In order to compensate a bit for this, we ask a fee of 5,000 US$ for the complete data set. The data set runs from June 2001 till today. It started with 25 languages back in 2001, and now measures more than 150 languages once a month. The data are available in comma separated format. Please contact sales@tiobe.com for more information.
  • Q: Why is the maximum taken to calculate the ranking for a grouping, why not the sum?A: Well, you can do it either way and both are wrong. If you take the sum, then you get the intersection twice. If you take the max, then you miss the difference. Which one to choose? Suppose somebody comes up with a new search term that is 10% of the original. If you take the max, nothing changes. If you take the sum then the ratings will rise 10%. So taking the sum will be an incentive for some to come up with all kinds of obscure terms for a language. That’s why we decided to take the max.The proper way to solve this is is of course to take the sum and subtract the intersection. This will give rise to an explosion of extra queries that must be performed. Suppose a language has a grouping of 15 terms, then you have to perform 32,768 queries (all combinations of intersections). So this seems not possible either… If somebody has a solution for this, please let us know.
  • Q: What happened to Java in April 2004? Did you change your methodology?A: No, we did not change our methodology at that time. Google changed its methodology. They performed a general sweep action to get rid of all kinds of web sites that had been pushed up. As a consequence, there was a huge drop for languages such as Java and C++. In order to minimize such fluctuations in the future, we added two more search engines (MSN and Yahoo) a few months after this incident.

转自 https://www.tiobe.com/tiobe-index/